I used "novel" to mean "all pitches of the second chord are different than the notes of the first chord". Equivocation is where a word has several meanings and in order to argue against someone, a person will use a DIFFERENT meaning than the one the other person used in order to argue against it. In Schoenberg's texts on traditional harmony, he placed diatonic chord progressions into three categories and, while not labelling them as "good, fair, or poor", he did recommend how often they should be used (which I guess is a roundabout way of saying it):Ĭlick to expand.Yes, you just outlined how you equivocated. It's the opposite of why #3 is "super strong". This may be a simple "rule of thumb" you're looking for.ĮTA: also you can see why #2 is "weak".because there are 2 common tones between the chords. But he said it has too much novelty and should be used sparingly, just not as sparingly as #2. It's "super strong" because the new chord is completely novel (all notes are completely new/not used in the previous chord). Super-strong Progressions- no common tones, all notes change. Intentionally never called this "weak", but said their use should be very restrictive.ģ. Descending Progressions- two common tones, one note changes. Ascending Progressions- one common tone, two tones change. Click to expand.In Schoenberg's texts on traditional harmony, he placed diatonic chord progressions into three categories and, while not labelling them as "good, fair, or poor", he did recommend how often they should be used (which I guess is a roundabout way of saying it):ġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |